|
Objection: 3.1. “Jews
don’t believe in the Trinity. We believe in one God, not three.”
Answer: “Just as Messianic Jews
probably misunderstand some of the things you believe, I think you
misunderstand some of the things I believe. We do not in any way
believe in three gods. My God is one, and his name is the LORD (or,
Yahweh, known to Orthodox Jews as HaShem). He revealed himself to
us through his Son, the Messiah, who is the very image and reflection
of God. And he touches us and speaks to us by his Spirit. These
are deep, spiritual truths. Later theologians labeled this relationship
the Trinity -- God as a triune One. But the word ‘Trinity’
is not found anywhere in the New Testament and it may confuse the
issues for you.” (See Answering Jewish Objections
to Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 3-14.)
Objection:
3.2. “If you claim that Jesus is God then you are guilty of
making God into a man. You are an idol worshiper!”
Answer: “We believe
that the eternally preexistent Son of God, through whom the universe
was made, came forth from God his Father and was clothed with human
flesh, making himself known to us as Yeshua the Messiah. He lived
on this earth, died, rose from the dead, and returned to his Father.
He now sits enthroned in heaven next to God. We understand that
Jesus, the Son of God, is the very image of God, the one in whom
God caused his fullness to dwell, the one through whom he revealed
himself completely to mankind. Since the Son came forth from the
Father and shares his divine nature, in one sense it is quite correct
to say that Jesus is God (or, divine, or deity), always bearing
in mind that the overwhelming testimony of the New Testament writings
is that Jesus is the Son of God. I can show you from the Hebrew
Scriptures that there is absolutely nothing idolatrous about what
I believe. God has always revealed himself to his people. He did
it most permanently and most fully through Jesus his Son.”
(See Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp.
14-37.)
Objection: 3.3. “God doesn’t
have a son.”
Answer: “It all depends
on what you mean by the word son. In the Hebrew Bible, Israel was
called God’s son, the king was called God’s
son, and the angels were called God’s sons. Is it any wonder
that the Messiah, the ideal representative of Israel, the king of
all earthly kings, and the one more highly exalted than the angels,
should be called God’s Son? More than anyone else who has
walked this earth, Jesus the Messiah is uniquely entitled to be
called the Son of God.” (See Answering Jewish Objections
to Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 38-48.)
Objection: 3.4. “According to
the Law (Deuteronomy 13), Jesus was a false prophet because he
taught us to follow other gods (namely, the Trinity, including
the god Jesus), gods our fathers have never known or worshiped.
This makes all his miracles utterly meaningless.”
Answer: “Have you ever
read what Jesus and his followers taught? They emphasized, ‘Love
the LORD your God with all your heart, mind, soul, and strength.
Follow him. Obey him!’ Jesus pointed everyone to God his Heavenly
Father -- by his miracles, by his message, and by his life. He lived,
died, and rose again for the glory of his Father. Thus Jesus was
a faithful and true prophet.” (See Answering Jewish
Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 48-52.)
Objection: 3.5. “The Holy
Spirit is not the so-called third person of the Trinity.”
Answer: “Rather than
discuss the Trinity again (see 3.1, above), let’s focus on
one question: Is the Holy Spirit only a ‘what’ or are
there dimensions in which the Spirit is a ‘who’? From
the Scriptures, it can be demonstrated that God’s Spirit is
more than just an abstract power. The Holy Spirit is part of God’s
very essence and clearly has personality. The New Testament simply
expands on these established, biblical truths, which, interestingly
enough, are treated in a similar way in some later Rabbinic traditions.”
(See Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp.
52-59.)
Objection: 3.6. “According
to Isaiah 43:11, God alone is our Savior. We don’t need or
recognize any other saviors.”
Answer: “Isaiah 43:11
is written with reference to other ‘gods’ and it teaches
emphatically that the Jewish people will not be saved by any other
so-called god or deliverer. This is clear. It is also clear that
God saves through whom he wills to save – whether it be earthly
deliverers (such as kings or warriors), angelic messengers, or the
Messiah.” (See Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus,
vol. 2, pp. 59-60.)
Objection: 3.7. “We are
righteous by what we do, not by what we believe. Christianity is
the religion of the creed, Judaism the religion of the deed.”
Answer: “The New Testament
clearly teaches that faith without works is dead. But it also teaches
that without faith, there can be no meaningful works, and the first
thing God wants from us is our total trust and dependence. That
is called faith, and it is foundational to the Hebrew Scriptures
as well. Our forefathers died in the wilderness because of their
unbelief, and being pronounced righteous by God begins with absolute
faith in him. So, right living is the result of right believing.
As a Jew, you should also remember that ‘the creed’
is important in traditional Judaism too.” (See Answering
Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 60-69.)
Objection: 3.8. “The Scriptures
clearly tells us that, ‘To do what is right and just is more
acceptable to the LORD than sacrifice’ (Prov. 21:3).”
Answer: “Amen! Who would
argue with Scripture? Elsewhere the Bible teaches that obedience
is better than sacrifice (1 Sam. 15:23). But these passages do not
denigrate the importance of sacrifices, as some anti-missionaries
would claim. Rather, throughout the Bible God opposes religious
hypocrisy and formal, outward observance of religious rites. He
would rather have our simple obedience than our lengthy prayers
or costly sacrifices if our hearts are not right with him. And he
would prefer that we just do what he says rather than that we sin,
repent, and bring a sacrifice for our sins. The sad fact is that
we all sin grievously and we all need atonement for our sins, a
subject that Scripture clearly affirms and teaches.”
(See Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp.
69-71.)
Objection: 3.9. “The prophets
indicated clearly that God did not care for blood sacrifices.
In fact, they practically repudiated the entire sacrificial system,
teaching that repentance and prayer were sufficient. The Talmudic
rabbis simply affirmed this biblical truth.”
Answer: “Some later
rabbis may have taught this, but the prophets certainly did not.
Everything the prophets did, they did out of allegiance to the Torah
and to reinforce what was written there. There is no possible way
that they would have repudiated the God-given, God-ordained, God-sanctioned
system of atonement as laid out in the Torah – especially
with the Temple standing. The prophets would not have contradicted
Moses. What the prophets repudiated was hypocritical religion. In
other words, they rejected the performance of sacred rites and the
keeping of special days when those practicing them had polluted
hearts. They were perfectly clear on this. It’s also interesting
to note that every traditional Jew around the world prays daily
for the restoration of the Temple and the sacrificial system. If
sacrifices were really unnecessary and unimportant, and if the prophets
utterly repudiated them, why pray daily for their restoration?”
(See Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2,
pp. 72-103.)
Objection: 3.10. “Even if I accept
your premise that blood sacrifices are of great importance in
the Torah, the fact is that our Hebrew Bible – including
the Torah itself – offer other means of atonement, not just
the shedding of blood.”
Answer: “There can
be no question that blood atonement is the central and most important
form of atonement in the Bible. The blood is essential, foundational,
and irreplaceable. Because blood sacrifices form the heart and soul
of the biblical system of atonement, both the New Testament and
numerous authoritative Rabbinic traditions state that without shedding
of blood, there is no atonement. Take away the blood, and the whole
biblical system of atonement collapses.” (See Answering
Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 103-123.)
Objection: 3.11. “According to Proverbs
16:6, love and good deeds make atonement. So who needs sacrifices?”
Answer: “If I were to
follow your logic, I just could as easily say, According to Proverbs
16:6, love and good deeds make atonement, so who needs Yom Kippur
(the Day of Atonement)? That is to say, if atonement can be made
between man and God through doing good, then there is no need for
suffering and chastisement, no need for prayers and confession,
no need even for the Day of Atonement. What Bible-believing Jew
would hold to such a view? This points us to the real meaning of
this verse, namely, ‘Through loving kindness and truth, sin
is wiped away.’ In other words, on a practical,
person to person level, being loyal, loving, and truthful will overcome
and eradicate the prior effects of sin. But the verse is not directly
related to issues of atonement, purification, and forgiveness in
the sight of God, nor is it reasonable to think that the Lord would
overthrow countless verses in the Torah with one phrase in Proverbs.”
(See Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp.
123-126.)
Objection: 3.12. “It’s
clear that you misunderstand the whole sacrificial system. Sacrifices
were for unintentional sins only. Repentance was the only remedy
for intentional sins.”
Answer: “We all know
that there were different functions for the sacrifices, including
ritual purification, thanksgiving, personal consecration, and making
of vows, along with atonement for unintentional sins. But the sacrifices
on Yom Kippur (the Day of Atonement) provided atonement for both
intentional and unintentional sins, something taught emphatically
in the Talmud and Law Codes. The Scriptures are clear on this, and
Jewish tradition never questioned it. There was also one particular
sacrifice (namely the ’asham -- the guilt offering, or reparation
offering) that, in conjunction with repentance, served as atonement
for intentional sins (called ‘transgressions’ in the
Bible). We should point out too that according to some Rabbinic
traditions, repentance could ‘convert’ intentional sins
to unintentional, hence paving the way for atonement through sacrifice.”
(See Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp.
126-135.)
Objection: 3.13. “Even if I accept
your arguments about the centrality of blood sacrifices, it only
holds true while the Temple is standing. The book of Daniel teaches
us that if the Temple has been destroyed and is not functional,
prayer replaces sacrifice. The book of Ezekiel is even more explicit,
telling Jews living in the exile – and therefore without
any access to the Temple, even if it were standing – that
repentance and good works are all God requires.”
Answer: “You are obviously
referring to is Ezekiel 18 and 33, where we learn that a wicked
man who repents is accepted by God – with no mention of sacrifices
– along with Daniel 6:10, where it tells us that Daniel, living
in exile, prayed toward the Temple (i.e., facing Jerusalem) three
times a day. But the idea that prayer replaces sacrifice is simply
not taught in the passages you refer to, nor is it in harmony with
other important passages from the Hebrew Scriptures. I also find
it interesting that the exiles couldn’t wait to return to
Jerusalem to rebuild the Temple and offer sacrifices again. They
knew how important this was. Further, it is significant that, to
this day, many Orthodox Jews kill a rooster or chicken on the Day
of Atonement and offer it as an atoning, substitutionary sacrifice
on their behalf. Despite the Rabbinic teaching that prayer has replaced
sacrifice, they still feel the need to offer a blood sacrifice on
Yom Kippur.” (See Answering Jewish Objections to
Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 136-152.)
Objection: 3.14. “The book of
Jonah totally shoots down all your arguments about sacrifice and
atonement, especially with reference to Gentiles. You see, when
Jonah preached, the people repented and God forgave them –
no sacrifice, no blood offering.”
Answer: “Did you know
that traditional Judaism, based on the Torah, teaches that the Temple
sacrifices made atonement for the Gentile world? This was part of
Israel’s call as a priestly nation, and it was Israel’s
Temple offerings that helped make Gentile repentance acceptable
to God.” (See Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus,
vol. 2, pp. 152-153.)
Objection: 3.15. “Even if
I admit that we need blood atonement, I still won’t believe
in Jesus. God wanted the blood of a goat or a lamb, not a person.
He doesn’t want human sacrifice!”
Answer: “All of us know
that God is not interested in human sacrifice. But are you aware
that the Hebrew Scriptures, the Talmud, as well as the New Testament
teach clearly that the death of the righteous has atoning power?
When the Messiah, the totally righteous one, laid down his life,
it was the ultimate act of atonement in human history.”
(See Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp.
153-167.)
Objection: 3.16. “I can’t
believe that the death of Jesus paid for my sins is that the Torah
teaches that for the blood to be effectual, it had to be poured
out on the altar in a specific way. This obviously does not refer
to Jesus!”
Answer: “The specific
laws in the Torah regarding the sprinkling of the blood on the altar
had to do with the sacrifices offered on that altar. In those cases,
specific regulations applied. At other times in the Hebrew Scriptures,
blood and sacrifices were offered in different ways and in different
places. More importantly, there is obviously no connection between
the laws for offering animal sacrifices on the altar and the Jewish
teaching that ‘the death of the righteous atones.’ Therefore
the blood of those righteous martyrs did not have to be poured out
on the altar of Jerusalem.” (See Answering Jewish
Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 167-168.)
Objection: 3.17. “If the
death of Jesus fulfilled the image of the sacrificial system, why
do the prophets anticipate sacrifices when the Third Temple is built?”
Answer: “I’m actually
glad that you raised this objection, since it has the merit of acknowledging
the importance of sacrifices and offerings in the prophetic books
(which is the exact opposite of the premise of objection 3.9, above).
However, from our current vantage point, it is difficult for us
to know exactly what God was speaking through the prophets concerning
a future Temple with restored sacrifices. Was the language merely
symbolic, with the Temple speaking of God’s presence among
his people and sacrifices speaking of their worshipful response?
Or will the prophecies be literally, not symbolically, fulfilled?
In that case, were the prophets speaking of a Temple to be built
by the Messiah in the age to come? If so, then we could cite the
Rabbinic tradition that in the age to come all sacrifices and offerings
will be abolished except for thanksgiving offerings. These sacrifices
would then be of a non-atoning character, and therefore would have
nothing to do with the once-and-for-all atonement purchased for
us by the sacrifice of Jesus the Messiah. In any case, we should
use caution in our discussion here, as did the Talmudic rabbis,
realizing how difficult it is to clearly interpret some of the key,
relevant chapters in the Tanakh.” (See Answering
Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 169-186.)
Objection: 3.18. “The Christian
concept of salvation is contrary to the Hebrew Bible and Jewish
tradition. Jews don’t need saving!”
Answer: “It seems to
me that you misunderstand the biblical concept of salvation, be
it ‘Christian’ or ‘Jewish.’ You probably
think of salvation in the Hebrew Bible in terms of earthly deliverance
and preservation, whereas you understand salvation in the New Testament
in totally spiritual terms, referring only to the salvation of the
soul. Actually, the concept of salvation in the Tanakh and in the
New Covenant Scriptures is comprehensive, dealing with spirit, soul,
and body, both in this world and the world to come; in other words,
salvation from sin and its effects. In that sense, all human beings,
sinful as we are, need saving.”(See Answering Jewish
Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 186-194.)
Objection: 3.19. “Jewish
people don’t need a middleman.”
Answer: “It all depends
on what you mean by ‘middleman.’ If you mean no Jew
could ever pray to God without a go-between acting on their behalf,
I agree with you: We don’t need a middleman. If you mean that
any individual Jew (or, the entire nation) could come into God’s
presence at any time, without a divinely ordained agent first going
to God on his or her behalf, I disagree with you. When God gave
us the Torah, he told us in no uncertain terms that only the descendants
of Aaron (i.e., the priests) could enter the Most Holy Place or
perform the annual atonement rituals. We were completely dependent
on them, along with the Levites who assisted them in their work.
So, in a general sense, any Jew can cry out to God at any time and
plead for mercy; in a specific sense, without priestly atonement
and intercession, no Jew has direct access to God.” (See
Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 195-198.)
Objection: 3.20. “Judaism
does not believe in original sin or a fall of man. We do not believe
that the human race is totally sinful.”
Answer: “There may be
some confusion with our terms. Messianic Jews and Christians believe
that we have fallen from the ideal state in which we were created,
and now moral corruption is an inescapable part of our nature. We
do not believe that people are totally and completely sinful, incapable
of doing or choosing anything good. Rather, we believe that by
nature we are hopelessly prone to sin
and thoroughly entangled with sin. It is because
Adam fell – and we must remember that Adam is the father of
the human race according to the Torah -- that there are murders,
rapes, thefts, and criminal acts committed every moment of every
day. Because of Adam’s fall, we kill one another in war, imprison
and torture one another for our own cruel purposes, and even commit
genocide. We spend millions of dollars annually on every type of
sexual perversion -- including pedophilia -- while we waste millions
more on addictive and destructive drugs. And even the best of us
admit to our moral failures, doing things we wish we wouldn’t
do -- in fact, we judge others for doing these very things -- and
being ashamed of our thoughts, words, or deeds. We are, tragically,
a fallen race.” (See Answering Jewish Objections
to Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 198-208.)
Objection: 3.21. “Jews don’t
need to repent.”
Answer: “On the contrary,
repentance is one of Judaism’s foundations! That’s why
our own traditional literature – from the Talmud to the Prayerbook
to Maimonides to contemporary Jewish thinkers – is filled
with teaching on repentance and prayers of repentance. Jews sin
like everybody else, and therefore Jews – just like other
human beings – need to repent. That’s why our traditional
literature puts such an emphasis on repentance.” (See
Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 208-210.)
Objection: 3.22. “Jews doesn’t
believe in a divine Messiah.”
Answer: “Judaism has
never had one, official, universally accepted set of beliefs concerning
the Messiah, but it is true that traditional Jewish teaching does
not speak unequivocally of a divine Messiah. However, Jewish tradition
often describes a highly exalted Messiah as well as a preexistent
Messiah, so much so that Jewish scholars have sometimes spoken of
the ‘semi-divine’ or ‘quasi-divine’ nature
of the Messiah according to these traditions. More importantly,
the Hebrew Bible itself speaks of the Messiah’s divine nature,
and that must be the deciding factor in what we as Jews do and do
not believe.” (See Answering Jewish Objections to
Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 210-220.)
Objection: 3.23. “Judaism
doesn’t believe in a suffering Messiah.”
Answer: “That is not
true. From the Talmud until our own day, important Jewish traditions
have acknowledged the Messiah’s suffering. In addition, many
Jews believe in two messiahs, a triumphant reigning
king called Messiah ben David, and a suffering warrior called Messiah
ben Joseph. More importantly, the Hebrew Scriptures speak clearly
of the Messiah’s sufferings. In fact, it is because our Bible
describes the Messiah as a priest as well as a
king that he had to suffer on our behalf, fulfilling his priestly
role. To miss this is to miss an essential part of the Messiah’s
work.” (See Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus,
vol. 2, pp. 220-231.)
Objection: 3.24. “Jews
don’t believe that the Messiah will come twice.”
Answer: “Judaism actually
has many different traditions about the coming of the Messiah, including
beliefs that there are two messiahs who will each
come once, as well as beliefs that there is a potential
Messiah present in each generation. Scriptures
and history teach us that there will be one Messiah
who will come twice.” (See Answering
Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 232-235.)
Objection: 3.25. “Judaism is
a healthy religion. Jews don’t see the world as intrinsically
evil, or denounce marriage or call for self-renunciation. Christianity,
on the other hand, see the world as evil, advocate celibacy, and
say: ‘Deny yourself, take up your cross, and suffer.’”
Answer: “This is an
exaggerated and inaccurate statement. Traditional Jews see this
world as the corridor to the world to come but stresses the importance
of life in this world. As for Christians, while stressing the importance
of the world to come, they have been responsible for the building
of more hospitals, the feeding of more hungry people, and the establishment
of more educational institutions than all other religions of the
world combined. The difference between the two is not one of substance
but of emphasis. So, the real question is, Which emphasis makes
more sense? If this life is only a passing shadow, (as Psalm 90
teaches), and if we are only pilgrims and strangers here (as Jacob
and David said), isn’t it logical to live out our few days
here in the light of eternity? If we are on this earth for 70 or
80 years and then we enter eternity -- either under God’s
favor or God’s judgment -- doesn’t it make sense to
give serious thought to the world to come, making sure we are ready
to enter our eternal home? Also, both Judaism and Christianity recognize
the sinful tendencies of the human race; Christianity
just puts greater emphasis on subduing those tendencies, calling
on its adherents to ‘put to death the harmful desires of the
sinful nature.’ Finally, Jesus emphasized that we are not
here primarily for ourselves but for God and for others, not to
be served but to serve. God’s kingdom is advanced through
suffering and sacrifice, and that too is part of our calling as
mature followers of the Messiah.” (See Answering
Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 235-248.)
Objection: 3.26. “Christianity
calls on its followers to exhibit unnatural emotions and feelings,
such as love for their enemies. This is contrary to Torah as well
as contrary to human nature.”
Answer: “Could it be
that what you call ‘unnatural emotions and feelings’
are actually lower, more base human attitudes, while the ethical
behavior that Jesus requires from his followers actually reflects
higher, more lofty, spiritual attitudes? Maybe not everything that
is ‘natural’ is good and not everything that is ‘unnatural’
is bad! Could it be that the Messiah calls us to a higher and better
life? Could it be that, through his gracious help, he enables us
to put to death our earthly, carnal tendencies and more fully reflect
the divine image in which we were created? I would suggest to you
that this represents a decided step up for the
human race, a fruit of the Messiah’s work on our behalf.”
(See Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 2, pp.
248-252.)
Objection: 3.27. “The only thing that keeps
a lot of people in the Christian faith -- including Jews -- is the
fear of hell.”
Answer: “Of the multiplied
thousands of followers of Jesus that I know around the world --
both Jews and Gentiles -- I can not think of one who continues to
follow Jesus primarily because of the fear of hell,
let alone only because of the fear of hell. We
follow him because we love him and we recognize him to be our Messiah.
Having said this, there is no question that, from a biblical perspective
(i.e., Torah, Prophets, Writings, New Testament), a healthy fear
of the Lord and a recognition that he is the ultimate Judge provides
an added incentive to holy living. So, our primary motivation for
following the Lord is love; a second motivation is to spend eternity
with him in his kingdom; a third motivation is to escape the judgment
of hell.” (See Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus,
vol. 2, pp. 252-256.)
Objection: 3.28. “I find much
beauty in the teachings of Jesus, and I think that there are some
good arguments in favor of Christianity. But I find it impossible
to believe in a religion that damns all people to hell -- including
many moral, good, kind, and sensitive people, not to mention countless
millions of religious Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, - simply
because they don’t believe in Jesus. I can’t follow
a religion whose God will torture people in flames forever for
not believing in someone they never even heard of.”
Answer: “To be equally
honest with you, I don’t follow that religion either, nor
would I be able to put my trust in a God like that. Only one thing
really matters: Is there a place called hell, and is there a judgment
after death? If so, what is hell like, and who deserves to go there?
What about you? Do you deserve heaven or hell? Also, we can argue
endlessly about the afterlife, something which neither of us has
experienced firsthand. But does your view of sin, judgment, and
God agree with the current state of the world, a world filled with
suffering and tragedy, and does it line up with the historical experience
of our people? What followers of Jesus believe is this: All of us
have sinned and broken God’s commandments, resulting in untold
tragedy for the human race. In his mercy, God sent his Son, the
Messiah, into the world to take our place and pay for our sins.
He is our hope and our salvation. If we reject him, we remain lost
in this world and we will be lost in the world to come. As to the
exact nature of the sufferings of hell, the Scripture do not speak
with scientific precision, but the Tanakh, the New Testament, and
even the Rabbinic literature give us some frightful descriptions.
As for those who never heard about Jesus, God will be their Judge,
not you and not me.” (See Answering Jewish Objections
to Jesus, vol. 2, pp. 256-263.)
Dr. Michael L. Brown
ICN Ministries
PO Box 1446
Harrisburg, NC 28075
704-782-3760
e-mail: ministry@icnministries.org
|